Politicians Vs. Anon Vs. Liberty Supporters Vs…

April 11th, 2014


Paying attention to some of the movements here in the United States, I’ve noticed some glaring differences in these political factions but some similarities as well. Can these revolutionaries find some common ground and work together to make this nation great again? I came to some interesting conclusions as I wrote this article.

Let’s begin with Occupy Wall Street aka OWS. When I heard of this movement I paid attention. At first they appeared to be protesting the banks and Wall Street finance for creating the economic crash of 2008 and the aftereffects. As they grew in size and peaked they soon faded. Their message became like a news broadcast, changing by the minute. First they wanted to slam Wall Street. Then they wanted to destroy all capitalism, not crony capitalism or corporatism, all capitalism – America’s bread and butter.

I decided to visit the Occupy Oakland encampment. It was filled with potheads, slackers, wannabe skaters, and the downtrodden. Now all of these people are Americans too. But their way of life had nothing in common with mine except for the fact that they were upset with Wall Street. Unfortunately what OWS in general seem to want, imo, is socialism which invariably leads to communism. They think everyone should get free food and free housing and this would be provided by taxing the middle class and the rich. In other words they want freebies.

OWS is part of the “progressive” movement. Overall they are far left and very liberal; meaning low sexual morality, gay marriage/transgender surgeries and rights need to be embraced, hardcore feminism (end patriarchy), white people are guilty of everything, getting high is good, shouldn’t have to work if others are (tax the worker and the rich), Christianity is evil but all other religions and their backers are good guys, etc. The list can go on. It get’s old. Hence, OWS faded into the dustbin of history. They wanted too much, too fast and kept changing their tune. They’re still around… in pieces.

Affiliated with Occupy Wall Street is Anonymous. Anonymous showed up before OWS but aligned itself with them, riding on the coattails of popularity, not that Anons needed to make a name for themselves, but they saw a way to get their goals pushed with OWS (foot soldiers). Anons are anonymous people, especially computer programmers/technicians, etc. who hack into government and corporate systems to wreak havoc – hacktivists from all over the world. There are many Anonymous members and they don’t agree on everything. They have public arguments on Twitter. Some are conservative but the majority are “progressive”. Anons and OWS is like peanut butter and jelly. They go together well.

On the opposite end of the spectrum is the Tea Party and the Liberty Supporters. The Tea Party is another grassroots movement that has gained a lot of steam and been accepted into the political arena. They represent middle America and Republicans mainly. But they want the candidate to be conservative in ideology and practice. Tea Party members tend to be Christian, against abortion in most cases, support free-markets, don’t support corrupt politicians or abusive banks/corporations and aren’t for smoking weed.

Liberty Supporters (a broad term) have similar traits to the Tea Party but also some differences. Many Liberty Supporters are fed up with both Democrats and Republicans unlike the Tea Party which believes America’s issues can be worked out with Washington DC through the Republican party/conservative stance (this may be the biggest difference between these two groups). Liberty Supporters believe the rule of the land should be by the US Constitution. They are fed up with eminent domain, Agenda 21, the United Nations and America’s role in globalization. They want America’s borders as protected as banks. They believe in hard work, self-responsibility, and accountability. They also believe in privacy. The Tea Party and Liberty Supporters could agree on a lot just as both OWS and Anonymous could.

As you can see the two main “progressive” groups and the two main conservative groups differ on most everything. The Occupy movement and the Anons seem to want to completely change America and destroy capitalism while the Tea Party and Liberty Supporters mainly want the corruption out of Washington DC and to have this nation ruled by the US Constitution without economic manipulation.

The first two groups are more destructive to America and appear to be opportunists, attacking anything that implies or practices American traditions or values while the latter two groups want to preserve America, many past practices, and the moral fiber of the country.

The groups appear to be incompatible. The “progressive” movements are more volatile and aggressive. They often play the race card and resort to cussing in debates. They are mad and are justified in some respects but not if they can’t back up their bullet points with facts.

The conservative leaning movement is more calm, cool, and collected. Why? Because they are used to being targets and tend to be older and more mature. Cries of racism, anti-immigrant, and evil for believing in God is constantly thrown at them. Conservatives (not fake Bush conservatives) use history showing positive/acceptable points of past-America and how it can be great again as data in debates. They continually turn the other cheek to their own detriment.

The things that the “progressives” and the conservative groups agree on, without knowing it as they are too busy with their own goals, is that they both aren’t in favor of:

1.) Globalization
2.) Unjust war
3.) American military being used as a global police force
4.) Police brutality
5.) Political deception
6.) Economic manipulation
7.) Corporate control

Those are large issues. They effect the entire world. It seems that some of the differences in these groups may actually be smaller than they realize but they are so angry and engrossed by their narrow field of focus that anything different is the enemy and therefore no compromise of working together could ever happen. Just as a corrupt manager keeps employees divided with rumor and falsehoods and then proceeds to solve the same employees problems, so does the US govt act in this fashion.

If we could set aside the issues of vegans vs. meat eaters, gay and transgender rights, the race card, etc. and focus on stopping globalization/corporatism/tyrannical govt. as a united country, we could make a big difference.

The problem that I see now, as I write this, is that the “progressives” need and want more government on their side while the conservatives do not. If the “progressives” lean towards a dependent livelihood, mandating free housing and food but the conservatives want less government and more self-reliance upon family and hard work… how could this unification of groups for a larger cause (stopping globalization and the ensuing destruction of cultures/diversity/traditions) ever happen? There’s a 99% chance that it cannot.

Assessing the situation it appears “progressives” are supporters of globalization whether they want to acknowledge it or not. Their fight against traditional America is anti-nationalistic, hence anti-traditional family and culture. That spells it out.

Conservatives want to reign American government in and live peacefully. “Progressives” want to destroy the old America and replace it with a global system where everyone is “equal” (free housing, free food, a job hand-picked for you, and micromanaging rules to exist by) where no dissenters to the pseudo “equality-for-all” mantra will be tolerated and will ultimately be shouted down for being racists, sexists, and anti-gay. And so you know, equality-for-all actually means where you are no better, no more gifted, no more exceptional, and not worth listening too. You are an ant like all the other ants in the colony. The theme will be, “Here’s a sandwich and some chips. Now sit down and shut up!”

The final conclusion is apparent, sad, and scary too. It’s sad that many people have become so dependent on government handouts and have accepted that lifestyle with the rabid belief that everyone else should be taxed more in order to create more freebies. The “progressives” and the conservatives cannot work together. Do you see a way? Right now I don’t. The spectrum and the goals appear to be very wide.

In the end we are all people. Our political views don’t make up the entirety of who we are but we do often get caught up in our belief systems. So much so that anything disagreeable is immediately deemed an enemy to be beaten down. The problem is just that. If people make politics their life and their meaning for existing… that’s an extreme.

In America the idea is for us to see one another as Americans first. Differing views can be expressed. Although if an American is not just trying to change something for the better, but is actively trying to turn the entire country upside down, that is extreme and that I am afraid is an enemy to all patriotic Americans. We can discuss and poll. We can create stats and gather facts. But we cannot destroy this nation for some idealistic, global “progressive” utopia.

I am certain all other peoples in their respective country’s feel the same way. Nations deserve their autonomy. What they don’t deserve is some hacktivist who aims to dismantle their entire system nor do they deserve corrupt politicians along with greedy corporations who raid their bank accounts. And they most certainly do not deserve to be sucked into a global world order where everyone is provided for by some far away bureaucracy. The people of the world deserve true autonomy and to have their practices, cultures, traditions, and family lineage preserved, respected, and looked upon with pride.

Is that so hard to appreciate?


April 10th, 2014

Bundy Ranch

ADDENDUM: 04/23/14 After recent racist comments made by Mr. Cliven Bundy I will no longer support his standoff against BLM and the Federal Government. Why? Simply put, I believe in a liberty movement that includes Americans of all races.

He stated: “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”

I get the the argument that living under government subsidies is comparable to a form of slavery – slavery of the mind and the inner-fire to make it on your own. But implying that blacks would be better off picking cotton and calling them “Negros”… that lack of intellect won’t unite liberty supporters under a single banner. And even though the BLM and the Feds are wrong for aiming weapons at the Bundy family and creating tiny, fenced-in “Free Speech Zones”… I can’t get behind a group that is ran by a man who’s thinking is narrow in scope. The big picture here is that America and freedom includes all colors of Americans. That is the liberty movement that I would put my stamp of approval on.

I agree with the principles of the standoff and that our government needs to shrink by 50%. Still, if you’re going to bring race into the picture in a derogatory fashion, you will be made the newest village idiot. Liberty supporters need modern day leaders of intelligence and who see value in every race and what everyone brings to the table of freedom. Picking cotton isn’t one of those values. Liberty cannot be made dependent upon people who espouse past-practices that are actually the war cry for others. Unification and the Pledge of Allegiance to America. Not division. All colors. All liberty supporters.


*The Old Post*

If you haven’t been following the plight of Bundy Ranch, owned by Cliven & Carol Bundy and their family since 1877 then you need to… now.

Apparently the Bundy’s have been in a dispute with the Feds; specifically Bureau of Land Management since the 90′s over grazing fees. The Bundy Ranch believes they have a right to graze their cattle on these lands due to longevity and heritage. The Bundy’s also believe it’s the State of Nevada that has jurisdiction, not the Feds. On the flip-side the Feds believe the Bundy’s have been skating by by not paying certain grazing fees.

One thing has lead to another. The Bundy’s won’t give up their rights, cattle, or ranch. Now 200 armed federal agents of BLM have moved in, surrounded the ranch, and are actively stealing the cattle and selling the livestock at auction (cattle rustlers used to hang for this). The Bundy’s have protested peacefully and have only been harassed, had weapons aimed at them, family members have been assaulted, and the climate is now tense.

Fortunately for social media; such as Twitter and Facebook, people have caught wind of what’s happening and they don’t like it one bit. Many neighbors from the locality and far away have shown up at the Bundy Ranch to support this family in defending its rights. But it’s not simply about them and grazing rights. Bundy Ranch means many different things to many different people.

The atmosphere in America today is full of fear. The federal government has created laws to freely spy on American citizens, detain citizens for an undetermined amount of time, torture citizens for information, and execute Americans without a trial.

We all know about the lies of the WMD’s in Iraq. We are aware of our hand in the destruction of Libya. Citizens know about our mess in Egypt and our governments support of Al Qaeda in Syria. We know how filthy, corrupt, and tyrannical our “elected” government has become. It’s not worth noting everything here. The corruption from both political parties and corporations has been well-documented. Needless to say the atmosphere in the US is thick with mistrust. Our government fears us and we fear them. Trusting one another seems impossible, and like a marriage, that is when it’s time for a divorce. Real talk.

Even if Cliven Bundy is found that he has no grazing rights this intensifying scenario means so much more. Having snipers aim weapons at you… creating First Amendment Zones so protestors can exercise their Freedom of Speech in a tiny spot… intimidating landowners (America’s provider of food)… it is clear to see that the Feds think The People are here to serve them and their agenda as opposed to having them (a government by the people and for the people) serve proud and intelligent Americans.

It’s a big moment. Will this simply fade away into history like Waco and Ruby Ridge or will it be the keg that sets off a revolt against the growing tyranny exercised by federal agents and their bosses across the nation? I’m not sure. I do know that people from all over want to show up at the Bundy Ranch and help this ranching family out. I also know from reading the social media sites that militia members are on their way to show both a sign of force and a willingness to protect the Bundys from being taken over. It’s that serious.

What happens now is anyone’s guess. What will BLM ultimately decide to do? If the cattle is all stolen and auctioned off how will the Bundy’s retaliate? Will someone cross a line and gunfire ensue? These are all relevant questions.

I’m certain that if shots are fired by federal agents, things will go from bad to worse. This could be the shot heard round the world; such as the Battle of Lexington and Concord in the Revolutionary War. The perspective about our untouchable government will make citizens want to get their hands on any Fed. Torches and pitchforks will be raised as The People chase the Frankenstein-like, mismanaged government agents up the steps of the capital.

It’s difficult to speculate on something like this. I hope it all ends peacefully. BLM drives away to never return. Obama repeals Obamacare and puts Holder in prison for the Fast and Furious gun-running program. The IRS is mandated to shrink by 50%. Our military is brought home. At home spying programs are eliminated. Corporations can’t go offshore for cheap labor. So many hopes. Just one of the above would be a step in the right direction.

As Americans standing together we should pray that the Feds turn tail and realize that it’s just not worth it. The men and women in those brown shirts should also realize that their paychecks and pensions aren’t worth sucking the freedoms from America, the US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. If the federal employees would search their hearts and join the ranks of the Liberty Supporters, the patriotic, and those who believe in rebuilding our wonderful nation… we could do anything. The USA could be a better place if a middle chord is struck. Unfortunately in the ranks of federal agents there is the fear of not having money. They are bought and paid for until they rid themselves of their master’s intimidating aura.

So people at Bundy Ranch, stay strong, vigilant, alert, and ready to confront those men and women who know not what they do. Educate them. Yell at them. Spank them. Whatever it is that will awaken The People of the USA… do it. But do it carefully. Give peace a chance and see how the feds react.

Rumor has it that YouTube was deleting the Bundy Ranch videos. Find them if you can and post them somewhere less controlling for everyone to watch.

Image from bundyranch.blogspot.com

American Economy About To Fall Apart?

April 4th, 2014


Why would I say something like that? Sure we have economists, folks in the Liberty Movement, followers of God, and preppers claiming that end times are upon us. Some say these are end times for the entire world. Others say it’s for the USA. I’ll tell you what… if it’s for the USA then you can bet your last dollar that a rough road is ahead for the world too. So why is the economy about to go south here in God’s country?

First a bit of history on why the American dollar is so widely used across the globe and why the high demand.

According to Wikipedia: A reserve currency (or anchor currency) is a currency that is held in significant quantities by governments and institutions as part of their foreign exchange reserves, and that is commonly used in international transactions. Persons who live in a country that issues a reserve currency can purchase imports and borrow across borders more cheaply than persons in other nations because they need not exchange their currency to do so.

The United States dollar is the world’s reserve currency, and the world’s need for dollars has allowed the United States government as well as US Americans to borrow at lower costs, granting them an advantage in excess of $100 billion per year. However, by increasing the value of the dollar, its status as a reserve currency hurts U.S. exporters.

According to the Wall Street Journal: When a South Korean wine wholesaler wants to import Chilean cabernet, the Korean importer buys U.S. dollars, not pesos, with which to pay the Chilean exporter. Indeed, the dollar is virtually the exclusive vehicle for foreign-exchange transactions between Chile and Korea, despite the fact that less than 20% of the merchandise trade of both countries is with the U.S.

Chile and Korea are hardly an anomaly: Fully 85% of foreign-exchange transactions world-wide are trades of other currencies for dollars. What’s more, what is true of foreign-exchange transactions is true of other international business. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries sets the price of oil in dollars. The dollar is the currency of denomination of half of all international debt securities. More than 60% of the foreign reserves of central banks and governments are in dollars.

Right now America is escalating sanctions (a pissing contest) with Russia over the “invasion” and annexation of Crimea from Ukraine. Why we care so much, I don’t know. Perhaps it’s the perfect excuse for us to ignite WWIII. American politicians are painting the USA into a corner with its boisterous mouth and actions. Russia, of course, is not sitting back. Instead they are taking full advantage of the situation.

I saw an article on Zerohedge that set off a light bulb. Russia (as well as China) is making some bold moves: China has led the BRICS efforts to dislodge the dollar from its position as the main global currency, but the “sanctions war” between Washington and Moscow gave an impetus to the long-awaited scheme to launch the petroruble and switch all Russian energy exports away from the US currency.

Apparently a large deal with India to bypass US dollars for oil is also in the works. So now we can include China, Russia, India, Iran, and other countries too that will bypass the dollar and trade in Yaun, Rubles, and other currencies. This will be a huge blow to the American economy and its world reserve currency status. Therefore the American economy is about to fall apart and WWIII will ignite. There is no negotiating our way out of this.

As I think upon this pathetic situation isn’t it convenient that our politicians and corporate America (globalists) have raided the American piggy bank by crashing the markets, playing high frequency trading, pumping the real estate bubble and popping it, increasing taxes on the middle class, and forcing Obamacare upon citizens? Then there’s the massive spy programs, the purchase of billions of rounds of hollow points by DHS, the armored personnel carriers for law enforcement officers, the Fast and Furious gun running into Mexico by Holder… the list goes on.

America has been turned upside down (a full 180 degrees). The People have been divided into too many political factions. And how perfect that our economy is about to fall apart as if everything before was orchestrated so that when the sh*t hits the fan our all knowing Big Brother leaders will be there to step in and sheer the sheep.

This may sound like the frothy ramblings of a madman. Maybe they are. Still if one connects the dots not just on a national level but on an international level… who hasn’t the American government or US multinational corporations screwed over? Who isn’t pissed at us? Is there anyone out there who trusts American leadership anymore and if not then why would anyone stay on the USA’s broke-ass bandwagon as a true fan?

God I feel sorry for the American consumer. How distracted. How blind. How consumer driven and quick-fix oriented we have been brainwashed to become. Yet there sits Russia, China, and others coiled and ready to strike at Yankee Doodle (Yankee Doodle was originally sung by British military officers to mock the disheveled, disorganized colonial “Yankees” during the Revolutionary war).

If the shoe fits…

I suspect that by the end of this summer there are going to be some heated exchanges between the US political structure and Russia. We might as well include China in there too. Solutions won’t be forthcoming as we all know that the dilution of the dollar via the Fed’s QE program will only push dollar buyers and investors further away (which is basically the entire world). The fix is in. Russia anted up. What will the USA’s next play be. All in?

Image from Dr. Leonard Coldwell.

The Middle Class Balances Society

April 4th, 2014

Middle Path

Ever hear of the “Middle Path”?

According to Buddha (aka Siddhartha Gautama) it is the character of the path he discovered that leads to liberation. There is addiction to indulgence of sense-pleasures, which is low, coarse, the way of ordinary people, unworthy, and unprofitable; and there is addiction to self-mortification, which is painful, unworthy, and unprofitable.

Avoiding both these extremes, the Tathagata (the Perfect One) has realized the Middle Path; it gives vision, gives knowledge, and leads to calm, to insight, to enlightenment and to Nibbana. And what is that Middle Path realized by the Tathagata…? It is the Noble Eightfold path, and nothing else, namely: right understanding, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness and right concentration.

You may be wondering what this has to do with the middle class? What makes something work so well is balance. Balance cannot be had if extremes of one end or the other are achieved. In society, especially American society, there are three main classes of existence for citizens – the rich, the middle class, and the struggling. Now keep in mind that this isn’t about class war. This is about extremes.

Existing as a struggling person in America, housing is most often limited to poor conditions. Diet is limited to cheap/unhealthy food. The intellect is limited to choices that are the norm within the poor condition of the neighborhood, overall environment, people, and commonality (hunger, desperation, anger, violence). A hopeless energy pervades the majority of the area and the people that survive there. This is not to say that all American citizens who are classified as poor per economic indicators behave terribly. But there are many more difficult situations to overcome concerning the basics compared to the other two brackets of existence.

Now let’s look at the other extreme. The polar opposite of the “existence spectrum” are the rich. Existing as a rich person in America, housing is only limited by personal preference; meaning all housing with a price is available as an option. Diet is what one decides to consume. The intellect is more likely to be advanced due to better parenting options, education options, and a wealth of resources available. The neighborhood architecture is representative of the occupants; extreme, over-the-top, excessive. Hunger, desperation, anger, and violence are rare occurrences unless it is related to a business decision. As you can read, money is the root of happiness or despair. Cash and the availability of it is the common theme between the two extremes of rich and struggling.

The personalities of the two classes are extremes too. The struggling may have their own lingo as opposed to proper English. The rich use proper English but may also understand more complicated terms and apply them. These of course are stereotypes. But stereotypes also come from truth. Group-speak is often more powerful than the individual who says “Judge me on my merits alone”. The media and others tend to bundle people into neat packages that are supposed to define one group compared to another. Again some of the bundling may be true when applied to groups. Statistics and the existence of math bares this out in many ways. It just depends on who is fudging the numbers.

The strugglers can be angry at their own existence, who they were born to, and where they live. On the other hand the rich can be oblivious to what’s right or wrong but be attuned to only what they want at the moment and on down the road because it’s accessible. Still from one extreme to another personalities on both sides can be warped, corrupted, and destroyed. The struggling may pimp some girls out. The rich may “rent” those girls for self-pleasure. The struggling may smuggle/sell street drugs. The rich may be customers. Demand always has a supplier as price dictates choice and opportunity. The higher quality a product then the greater the price. This is where the lack of morality and the lack of appreciation comes into play.

Those who struggle don’t have much to appreciate. What’s food in the belly if it tastes horrible or it’s common knowledge that it will lead to an early death? Living may turn into existing for the sake of “getting mine” until someone else takes him or her out. The same goes for many of the rich. Living turns into existing if everything is available. Sure it may be more fun for a time but if appreciation isn’t there and expectation of unlimited availability is always there then that is a hallow shell in fancy clothes. Life becomes dull and loses its luster. The key is that there is a lack of morality. A lack of appreciation. A lack of respecting the self and others.

A nation cannot survive on extremes. The extremes of the haves and the have-nots. This is where the middle path comes into play. In this case it is the middle class. Balanced as opposed to poor or elite. The middle class employs the most people. The middle class is taxed the most. The middle class creates the majority of businesses. They are the generators of inventions, ideas, products, commerce, employment, and the main flow of capital. The middle class tends to appreciate what they have because they worked for it. Their neighborhoods tend to be conservative in appearance, not overly decorated or rundown. They appreciate what they have. Their morality tends to be, especially in the past, honed upon a religious upbringing, respect for family values, and a desire to do well. It is this sweat of the brow, the self-made person that elicits appreciation for most things, people, and the self. The middle class is balanced as well as the heart of America. Without them there is nothing but the haves vs. the have-nots. And that cannot work for long.

I know that I have made generalizations here. There are many success stories from the struggling class. That sense of hopelessness invigorates many to succeed and to create healthier and more successful lives for them and their family. Not all who have little money are bad and I don’t mean to infer that. Growing up, we lived in a Volkswagen bus for a time. We struggled but grew from it.

On the flip-side not all rich people have their heads buried in a pile of cash. There are many well-to-do people who enjoy making money and employing others while offering great benefit packages. There are financially elite people who believe in free markets as opposed to crony capitalism. Some wealthy people see how the system has been abused and would like to see the abusers jailed. Not all rich folks believe they own the world or suffer from a lack of morality and a appreciation for life.

It is not my belief that the rich should be taxed so much that their wealth is ultimately transferred to those who struggle at the other end of the spectrum. Taxing or confiscating another person’s wealth and giving it to another is theft. Theft by government. The person receiving that infusion of cash is not becoming a more moral person or somehow becoming more appreciative or respectable. They are simply getting money. Money for nothing.

It is the hard work that one applies to not only themselves as a growing person but also as a working human that sparks the growth of self-knowledge. Self-knowledge sparks exploration. Exploration sparks new insights and experiences. Hard work is the key to the middle class. This is the balance that is necessary in America. And the middle class is being taxed and priced out of existence. The taxes go to massive social programs for those who struggle. Prices are paid by the middle class for goods – profits for the rich. It is the middle class that is taking the hits from both ends. Yet it is they that are the key to a successful society.

In order for America to survive as a free nation that honors the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the reasonable laws of the land it must rein in the government, allow the free market to operate, and put limits on how massive a corporation can get and punish it if it drops its workers for cheap, overseas labor. It is middle America that is the life blood of this country. Being slammed for wanting to succeed, for going to church, for having family values and morals, for employing people fairly – what is the point of being a free people if one is being slammed for being just that, free?

Allow the middle class to breathe. Let them grow without unlimited government intervention. Watch as they employ more people and success is shared. This is the core of the middle class and it can be achieved. All is not lost.

Image from individunification.com

Time For America To Do The Opposite?

March 29th, 2014


There’s a saying that goes, “If what you’re doing isn’t working then try the opposite”. I don’t remember who said it but I’ve always kept that one locked away in the brain for future use. I believe those that can apply it are nimble enough to adapt to change. Practitioners have the ability to see their own errors and/or a landscape that requires flexibility, not stubborn rigidity.

The saying applies to the US government’s current actions, inactions, and policies. According to Paul Craig Roberts recent post, Pushing Toward The Final War, he states the following:

Washington is the government that invaded and destroyed Afghanistan and Iraq on the basis of lies. Washington is the government that financed and organized the overthrow of the Libyan and Honduran governments and that is currently attempting to do the same thing to Syria and Venezuela. Washington is the government that attacks with drones and bombs populations in the sovereign countries of Pakistan and Yemen. Washington is the government that has troops all over Africa. Washington is the government that has surrounded Russia, China, and Iran with military bases. It is this warmongering collection of Washington war criminals that now asserts that it is standing up for international ideals against Russia.

Now I’m not so naive to believe that other countries haven’t spied on, infiltrated, invaded, annexed, or treated their neighbors unfairly. The difference between us and them is that America, which is represented by the US government, is supposed to be the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. A country where Lady Liberty stands tall and proud. Where the scales of justice are fair and balanced. It’s spelled out in the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. This isn’t simple propaganda. Yet for the past several decades all of our forefather’s and nation’s documented ideals and laws are being trampled upon in the name of not only American interests but global interests.

If Paul Craig Roberts is to be taken seriously, and I believe he is, then America is in deep trouble. So I would think that if current US government moves aren’t getting the desired results (if that is the honest case) then perhaps the opposite should be the next move. If our “elected” leaders are serious about American law and respecting the freedom and liberty of not only its citizens but that of other nations too then I would think a pull back is in order.

The image of America has taken a huge hit in not only international circles but at home as well. Thinking logically, if I am upsetting not only my coworkers but my family members too then the commonsense step would be for me to change my behavior, apologize to everyone, and get back to my original self so I don’t lose my job and my family. We are interconnected labor wise, economically, and through close relationships. That move makes sense.

So why doesn’t the US government pull back? Why aren’t we reigning in our troops? How come we haven’t stopped the abusive spy programs? When will a top tier government official be prosecuted for their role in the Fast and Furious gun running program or for using the IRS to intimidate conservative non-profit groups? How come leadership of socialistic groups like Occupy Wall Street continue on unfettered but law abiding citizens; such as gun owners and journalists are being threatened to have their rights have modest burdens placed upon them? Why is the US Navy’s motto “A Global Force For Good”?

If America’s politicians truly have the heart of an American, if they are patriots as opposed to multinational corporatists and globalists, they would see that it is not only in America’s best interest but also the world’s best interest if they pulled back, shrank US government from its current bloated bureaucracy and became a government for The People by The People. Instead of creating more complicated laws as opposed to enforcing current laws on the books and instead of intertwining with global groups that ensnare all people, America would become a more free nation.

It is in America’s best interest to do the opposite of what it is doing now. Sometimes going in reverse gives the driver the ability to see from a better angle. Stating such a move, some would call me an isolationist. That is a think-tank term concocted to belittle anyone who believes we should focus on our country, our fellow countrymen, and what ills we are going through. This term makes me look bad in some eyes because it’s a simple label that is supposed to encapsulate me as someone who fears the world or a xenophobe when in fact the opposite is true.

I embrace the world with respect. I respect a nation’s autonomy. All cultures have the God given right to practice their way of life until it changes from within for whatever reason. American capitalism has been manipulated, abused, and finally morphed into corporatism while simultaneously jumping on the bandwagon of globalization as justification to assist in the spread of consumerism, one of the many prongs of attack on foreign cultures and diversity everywhere. I have zero respect for self-sustaining goals that are placed upon the backs and minds of the uneducated, naive, or genuinely kind people of the world.

Our politicians won’t do the opposite. I know that. Too much money, debt, and human beings as the ultimate resource is at stake. Therefore I know that what US politicians are doing to its citizens and the world is actually well-thought out, orchestrated, and obviously on purpose with prejudice towards freedom. If America had honest people in charge this country would be much better off. Instead we have corrupt, greedy caricatures of humans in office who are intentionally ramming America’s reputation down the toilet with immoral media, massive spy programs, taking of natural resources, and invading wherever convenient.

The lesson here is this – don’t be like an American politician. When you have a problem, especially a chronic one, do the opposite. You may even need to isolate yourself for a time to avoid those toxic relationships in your life. It makes sense and it may pay off in dividends.

Image from Beyond the Car Seat.

377 Words That May Trigger An Official Visit

March 28th, 2014


According to Sovereign Man, the Department of Homeland Security and other US government alphabet agencies specifically monitor the internet for 377 particular words. I am sure there are other words, phrases, and numbers they hone in on but be assured, you are safe because of this non-stop, diligent, government sponsored, spying program. Then again, perhaps you are the party of interest.

List of DHS monitoring keywords:

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Coast Guard (USCG)
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Border Patrol
Secret Service (USSS)
National Operations Center (NOC)
Homeland Defense
Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Task Force
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Fusion Center
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)
Secure Border Initiative (SBI)
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF)
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS)
Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS)
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Air Marshal
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
National Guard
Red Cross
United Nations (UN)
Domestic security
Law enforcement
Disaster assistance
Disaster management
DNDO (Domestic Nuclear Detection Office)
National preparedness
Dirty bomb
Domestic nuclear detection
Emergency management
Emergency response
First responder
Homeland security
Maritime domain awareness (MDA)
National preparedness initiative
Militia Shooting
Shots fired
Explosion (explosive)
Disaster medical assistance team (DMAT)
Organized crime
National security
State of emergency
Bomb (squad or threat)
Pipe bomb
Chemical spill
Suspicious package/device
National laboratory
Nuclear facility
Nuclear threat
Biological infection (or event)
Chemical burn
Hazardous material incident
Industrial spill
Powder (white)
Blister agent
Chemical agent
Nerve agent
North Korea
Food Poisoning
Foot and Mouth (FMD)
Small Pox
Human to human
Human to Animal
Center for Disease Control (CDC)
Drug Administration (FDA)
Public Health
Toxic Agro
Terror Tuberculosis (TB)
Water/air borne
Norvo Virus
World Health Organization (WHO) (and components)
Viral Hemorrhagic Fever
E. Coli
Infrastructure security
CIKR (Critical Infrastructure & Key Resources)
Computer infrastructure
Communications infrastructure
Critical infrastructure
National infrastructure
Airplane (and derivatives)
Chemical fire
Port Authority
NBIC (National Biosurveillance Integration Center)
Transportation security
Body scanner
Failure or outage
Black out
Brown out
Service disruption
Power lines
Drug cartel
U.S. Consulate
El Paso
Fort Hancock
San Diego
Ciudad Juarez
Mara salvatrucha
MS13 or MS-13
Drug war
Mexican army
Cartel de Golfo
Gulf Cartel
La Familia
Nuevo Leon
Narco banners (Spanish equivalents)
Los Zetas
Meth Lab
Drug trade
Illegal immigrants
Smuggling (smugglers)
Barrio Azteca
Artistic Assassins
New Federation
Al Qaeda (all spellings)
Environmental terrorist
Eco terrorism
Conventional weapon
Weapons grade
Dirty bomb
Chemical weapon
Biological weapon
Ammonium nitrate
Improvised explosive device
IED (Improvised Explosive Device)
Abu Sayyaf
FARC (Armed Revolutionary Forces Colombia)
IRA (Irish Republican Army)
ETA (Euskadi ta Askatasuna)
Basque Separatists
Tamil Tigers
PLF (Palestine Liberation Front)
PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization
Car bomb
Weapons cache
Suicide bomber
Suicide attack
Suspicious substance
AQAP (AL Qaeda Arabian Peninsula)
AQIM (Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb)
TTP (Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan)
Home grown
Extreme weather
Forest fire
Brush fire
Tsunami Warning Center
Mud slide or Mudslide
Power outage
Brown out
Emergency Broadcast System
Cyber security
DDOS (dedicated denial of service)
Denial of service
Cyber Command
Cain and abel
Brute forcing
Mysql injection
Cyber attack
Cyber terror
Social media

I am sure that this list is flexible; meaning as US targets, interests, and people who speak up change, so does the word list. Not all of it. Some of the words are probably classics and always stay under Big Brother’s watch; such as gunfight, execution, or assassination. Words like that never go unnoticed. Uh oh. I just wrote all those words. Now I’m being watched. You know what though? I bet I’ve been watched for some time. Why? Because I write. I write about the negatives of globalization and how it’s unfolding and being dumped upon the people of the world. I’m not a conformist in that regard. Oh well.

So how does it feel if you’re a reporter, journalist, writer, blogger, activist, or simply a good citizen and you have to second-guess whether or not you should type a particular word because you’re afraid of possible consequences? Pretty lame, eh?

Welcome to your new Amerika.

Image from Department of Homeland Security.

A Modest Burden Placed On Your Rights

March 26th, 2014

Modest Burden

On Tuesday, 03/25/14, a federal appeals court upheld two San Francisco gun laws challenged by the National Rifle Association and gun owners who live in the city.

One of the city’s gun laws challenged bans the sale of ammunition that expands on impact, has “no sporting purpose” and is commonly referred to as hollow-point bullets.

Chuck Michel, the lead attorney on the NRA-backed lawsuit said, “Self-defense is not a sport.”

Judge Sandra Ikuta said San Francisco residents were free to buy the banned bullets outside city limits. That limitation “imposes only modest burdens on the Second Amendment right,” she stated.

So reading between the lines am I to assume that it’s okay to limit The People’s constitutional rights (The Bill of Rights) within a city’s boundaries? Ikuta admitted that it’s okay to buy the targeted ammunition elsewhere and that by outright banning it in San Francisco as a purchasable product that she is restraining the Second Amendment or is she really restraining it at all? Perhaps she is simply using such offensive language to set a precedent for future constitutional cases?

The scary thing here is what does a “modest burden” look like when it comes to American citizen’s constitutional rights? Are modest burdens being placed on other rights? Let’s take a look.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

What about freedom of speech? Have American citizens ever been shutdown because the US Government didn’t like what someone was saying? Have they been falsely accused of abusing their freedom of speech in order to coverup a government action/inaction? Of course! Remember Sam Bacile?

He made an anti-Muslim film that the US Government blamed for causing the riots in Benghazi where US diplomats and coworkers were killed. Mr. Bacile went into hiding due to the media spotlight that was immediately placed on him. Soon after he was conveniently arrested for violating parole by uploading the video to YouTube (which I haven’t watched nor am I defending).

It came out that President Obama and his staff did nothing to jump on top of the Benghazi killings until some time after and that the anti-Muslim video was used as a scapegoat.

So was the arrest of the video-maker simply a “modest burden” placed on his right to freedom of speech?

How about freedom of press, also listed in Amendment I? According to this article in the NY Daily News Dozens of leading news organizations have protested to the White House against restrictions that sometimes keep journalists from taking pictures and video of President Barack Obama performing official duties.

Some press groups urged their members to stop using official photos and video handed out by the White House, dismissing them as little more than “government propaganda.”

Are these actions simply a “modest burden” on the constitution and the Bill of Rights? If so, are modest burdens acceptable? If we are conditioned to accept these modest burdens then how will we put up a fight if modest turns to strong? It’s these little nudges that need to be stopped otherwise we will be too afraid to stop strong attacks, let alone modest, on our nation’s laws.

Here’s another example; Amendment IV which is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

We all know about Snowden’s revelations (and verification) about the massive, global spy network the NSA and other US Government agencies have been illegally invading everyone’s privacy and collecting personal data. Not considering the global community for a moment, is this simply a modest burden placed upon the Fourth Amendment? Is spying on American citizens and collecting their data without a warrant acceptable because a terrorist may be plotting? So it’s okay to toss the Bill of Rights out the window?

There have been so many news articles, television shows, interviews and other revelations about the abuse the US Government has been performing when it comes to the Fourth Amendment that I’m thinking we are simply becoming conditioned to accept it because they know that we won’t do anything about it and that by saturating us with this information that it becomes second-nature and okay. We may not like it but it’s just one of the necessities for safety as opposed to freedom and liberty. This is how many American people justify this oppressive behavior – by lowering their head and going with the flow.

Mr. and Mrs. America need to wake up. Do we want to become like the USSR of the Cold War era where neighbors spy on one another? Where the press is controlled by the state? Where guns aren’t legal to own? The USSR was a horrible place to live… er survive. People struggled for good food, legitimate news and trustworthy neighbors. And that is exactly what will happen in America if we don’t smash these “modest burdens”.

Go get to work and stop this crap! What the hell you waitin’ for?!

Image from Karen Levine blog.

Destructive Plan For USA Unfolding?

March 21st, 2014


When I watch or listen to American politicians speak and make decisions I know that they can’t be that dumb. Poor terminology but it fits. These people are the leaders of America, the land of the free and the home of the brave. The United States of America has been a beacon of hope for the world yet this nation has been turned upside down by the very leadership that is supposed to be the brightest, the best and the most intelligent we have to offer. So, are our leaders truly naive and out of touch or are they making well-thought out decisions (not based on what’s best for the American people) for a plan that’s foreign to truth, freedom and the American way?

I believe that the likes of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein and all the other senior politicians, both in the not-so-distant past and present day, know exactly what they are doing when it comes to making glaringly poor decisions for America and the American people. In the past couple decades, probably right around the forties to the mid to late sixties, the goals for the US government changed from becoming a land of milk and honey to morphing into a power hungry, socialistic empire bent on promoting dependency for its citizens as opposed to desiring independent, responsible and creative thinkers. But not just for American citizens. For the entire world through the growing power of globalization.

Back in the early 1900′s (after the end of World War One) the League of Nations came to fruition.

According to History Learning Site, The League of Nation’s task was to ensure that war never broke out again. After the turmoil caused by the Versailles Treaty, many looked to the League to bring stability to the world.

The League of Nations was to be based in Geneva, Switzerland. This choice was natural as Switzerland was a neutral country and had not fought in World War One.

If a dispute did occur, the League could do three things known as sanctions:

1.) It could call on the states in dispute to sit down and discuss the problem in an orderly/peaceful manner. This would be done in the League’s Assembly. If one nation was seen to be the offender, the League could introduce verbal sanctions – warning an aggressor nation that she would need to leave another nation’s territory or face the consequences.

2.) If the states in dispute failed to listen to the Assembly’s decision, the League could introduce economic sanctions. This would be arranged by the League’s Council. The purpose of this sanction was to financially hit the aggressor nation so that she would have to do as the League required. The League could order League members not to do any trade with an aggressor nation in an effort to bring that aggressor nation to heel.

3.) If this failed, the League could introduce physical sanctions. This meant that military force would be used to put into place the League’s decision. However, the League did not have a military force at its disposal and no member of the League had to provide one under the terms of joining – unlike the current United Nations. Therefore, it could not carry out any threats and any country defying its authority would have been very aware of this weakness.

The League also had another weakness:

The country, whose president, Woodrow Wilson, had dreamt up the idea of the League – America – refused to join. America’s refusal to join the League, fitted in with her desire to have an isolationist policy throughout the world.

The policy of having an international assembly of nations that could attempt to deter aggression through verbal, economic and possible military sanctions changed (due to supposed ineffectiveness) into a policy of unfair loan practices, economic coercion, corruption, social manipulation, cookie cutter education, psychological attacks on customs and cultures, regulation of native resources, and no representation via elections when the United Nations replaced the League of Nations in 1945.

According to the UN website: The work of the United Nations reaches every corner of the globe. Although best known for peacekeeping, peacebuilding, conflict prevention and humanitarian assistance, there are many other ways the United Nations and its System (specialized agencies, funds and programmes) affect our lives and make the world a better place. The Organization works on a broad range of fundamental issues, from sustainable development, environment and refugees protection, disaster relief, counter terrorism, disarmament and non-proliferation, to promoting democracy, human rights, gender equality and the advancement of women, governance, economic and social development and international health, clearing landmines, expanding food production, and more, in order to achieve its goals and coordinate efforts for a safer world for this and future generations.

That is no small list and it sinks it’s teeth into every aspect of every person’s life.

The idea used to be about stifling an aggressive nation, not going in to promote human rights, foster social and economic development and protect the environment. That is the sole responsibility of every unique nation to do for itself in a way that they deem fit which meets their local customs, culture and family dynamic. That’s called autonomy. Instead, the UN was designed to implant themselves and their social engineering policies upon unique nations across the world. The League of Nations was to stop aggression. The United Nations is to stifle independent and differing ways of existing.

When you have groups like the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization that works with the United Nations to secure economic hooks into independent countries via international law… when you have multinational corporations working with international bodies to create higher profit margins through product placement, Hollywood movies with social engineering plot lines… when you have an international power structure dictating rules where not one regular citizen voted to have it exist in the first place… the USA and the rest of the world has a problem.

So I go back to my original train of thought. There is a destructive plan unfolding for the USA. The plan to grow America as a shining star of liberty has been exchanged for a plan of global compliance and conformity under the rule of collectivism. Collectivism (aka It Takes a Village) is the new breed of socialism and communism. Collectivism, progressive, social justice, environmental justice, wage inequality, gender inequality… all those liberal, prepackaged, well-thought out terms are code for “everyone must be the same”. These terms are propaganda that comes from a think-tank. Propaganda is for nudging citizens in a certain direction in order to fulfill a plan deemed acceptable by the planners. The planners being globalists.

As our modern timeline continues forward, politicians and leadership aren’t simply reacting to each situation, minute by minute. A well-thought out global agenda that has options for any situation that may arise has been created. It has clearly taken the place of the United States Constitution, the original laws of the land. Instead of supporting We the People, our God inspired rights and the constitutional laws, leadership is creating policies/laws to strangle any form of capitalism and independence, supporting other nations financially, turning their backs upon religion and attacking the US constitution. How much more blatant can it get?

We used to be the example. Now our politicians have made so many unfriendly moves against not only its own citizens but towards other nations one must step back and observe how many friends we no longer have. Our government has laid waste to Libya; turned its back on Egypt; strangled relations with Israel; supported Al Qaeda in Syria; placed sanctions on Russia… who haven’t we upset?

Now don’t be fooled. These poor decisions aren’t by accident. I believe they are on purpose. Once again the plan isn’t to strengthen America or to make it a neutral power. It is to destroy America, the nation of freedom. As Russia moves towards China; as Iran and Venezuela move towards Russia and China together; as Africa makes more deals with China; as Australia and other countries make currency deals with China… the world is moving to a new global order while our leaders sink us further so that we will all become a part of the global collective empire. The economic interdependence of the world was created for the purpose of erasing not just borders but also cultures, customs, families, patriarchy and independence. It’s a simple side-effect that will come with time.

This is the destructive plan for the USA.

Image from Jackson-Consulting.

Do Globalization And Diversity Mix?

March 14th, 2014


I was thinking about this tonight. It’s from one of my many tweets:


Globalization is the harmonization or the standardization of systems and total uniformity. You are standardized (e.g. Common Core Curriculum). Where is the diversity in that? Some people, particular activists, focus solely on those that make money through multinational companies which seek out cheap labor and new markets to introduce their products. Defining globalization or explaining the negatives of globalization simply as companies that exploit people for profit is short-sighted and frankly a way to attack capitalism (this abused form is actually corporatism). It’s a legitimate gripe, I fully agree, but it’s also the calling card of communists and socialists who want to cast a negative light on capitalism via blanket statements (as opposed to corporatism or crony capitalism) in order to usher in a system of dependency and safety.

Even Wikipedia defines the anti-globalist in a similar way: The anti-globalization movement, or counter-globalisation movement,[1] is critical of the globalization of corporate capitalism. The movement is also commonly referred to as the global justice movement,[2] alter-globalization movement, anti-globalist movement, anti-corporate globalization movement,[3] or movement against neoliberal globalization.

That’s a very narrow definition of an anti-globalist and doesn’t do the real issues of globalization justice. Exploitation of cheap labor, human beings, is a very real issue, but it’s not the only issue out there.

The real issues of globalizing the world are many. A few are listed below:

- Exploitation of cheap labor
- Manipulation of natives through product placement
- Picking and choosing what customs natives should practice
- Providing alternative food choices to natives
- Changing local values through television programs
- Belittling religious values of locals
- Control over local resources by foreign Govt./Corp.
- Control of schools by foreign bureaucracy
- Limiting natives of growing/hunting/gathering natural resources

The previous issues are a handful of thousands. Globalization isn’t simply about multinational companies and making money. It’s about ultimately controlling the greatest resource on the planet – humans. It’s about standardizing all peoples across the globe to act and think alike. And that is where my point of this post comes in – diversity.

Many global activists scream for diversity on a global scale. Here in America the “illegal immigrant” movement is championed by those who think that denying 20 million illegals from being granted American citizenship is based purely on racism. It’s not. It’s based purely on economics, healthcare, a limited supply of tax dollars able to support more humans, etc.

What I’m getting at is that globalization and diversity don’t mix. The world can’t be globalized and magically all cultures and customs of peoples across the planet will remain unscathed. Diversity will be the first victim because diversity is the true target. Some that champion “illegal immigrants” do it out of a good heart. Many may want a form of “social justice” (global speak for “give me stuff”). Others want Aztlan (Southwest of the US) back and make no bones about it.

Deep in the halls of power, the globalists want to bring in more cultures/more natives from other countries to brainwash them into the American lifestyle which, by the way, is under attack and being changed from the American dream of monetary and life success (freedom, liberty and choice) to group dependency; dependency upon government. This is why “diversity” is so popular. Those in power and those who want more power are using it as a psychological weapon (steering in a particular direction), meanwhile those folks with good hearts but no knowledge of these devilish goals are becoming unwitting foot-soldiers for the globalist agenda which aims to destroy them in the end. Sick. I know.

Diversity is popular because it’s a way to get at all cultures (kind of like the environment, another term that encapsulates all humans). It’s a way to steer the natives away from their culture, customs and heritage by providing them and their future generations with promises of a easier life. The promise is hallow. It rings of giving crack to first time customers. A tease. Once the hooks are in they have a customer for life. The same goes for globalization. Everyday more people hear the word bandied about by the liberal media as a good thing. We live in a globalized world and economy. We’re all interconnected. New global rules need to be put in place the pundits say. The future will be bright if we only give up our borders, our property… our history. Not true. Once there, there will be no escape. As technology evolves exponentially (but “leadership” does not), the ability for people to have privacy, to avoid the tax collector, to escape anything will be zero. The globalized world, a false utopia, will be a dream for those in power and Hell for those under their gavel.

Diversity is the opposite of globalization – they do not and cannot mix. I am not an isolationist but American citizens do not have an unlimited wallet (nor does any other country). Our government is supposed to be a limited one by and for The People (citizens within the community). Instead our politicians are waging election campaigns based on “illegal immigrants” and the hot button of diversity. It’s a ruse. The globalist masters could care less about what natives across the world practice, believe, worship or appreciate. In the end it’s all about pressing the right buttons to get anyone to follow them.

The next time someone is screaming for diversity ask them how globalization will help. Their activism is bringing in the globalized world, the eater of diversity. You want to have unique people and cultures to survive across the world, then be an anti-globalist. A real anti-globalist. Not someone who just focuses on multinational corporations, although they are a huge problem. Take the big picture into consideration. It’s about harnessing all of mankind into some controlled super-state. A hardcore communist’s and socialist’s wet dream.

Believe it.

Image from College of Charleston.

Do People Exist For The Benefit Of The State?

February 26th, 2014

Power of State

I’ve been watching a video called, Agenda: Grinding America Down on YouTube. It’s an expose by Curtis Bowers on the roots of communism and socialism and how those who follow have taken over American policy and goals through the sabotage of powerful industries (Hollywood, media, education, welfare, government, environment, church, etc.) as opposed to simply declaring an open revolt, something impossible in a united, Christian nation.

The film discusses and documents the actions of the likes of Marx, Lenin, Ayers, Obama and many others who have not only birthed this decades long revolution but who have helped promote it within their own lifespans as well. It connects the dots of how all of these men and women have influenced each other, those around them and how they have turned the American way upside down. The decay of America is no accident. Music, movies, education, some churches… they are all being manipulated within to dumb the populace down into dependency.

The question, “Do people exist for the benefit of the state?” came up during the documentary. I think it’s a great question as it is relevant today. The answer is simple. No. People do not exist for the benefit of the state. But I think that as time has gone on with dark forces at hand, changing American society into an immoral cesspool of cry-baby beggars who need their fix, it is clear that many believe humans exist for the benefit of government.

With Christianity being attacked, freedoms being attacked, the US Constitution being attacked, private property being attacked, organic food being attacked, voting results being turned over by the courts, government medical insurance being mandatory for all, food being attacked, marijuana being accepted… the list goes on… obviously the rights of Americans to live a moral and peaceful life is being attacked by those not only in political positions, but by the communist and socialist ideology. All humans must be ruled over by a massive central authority for their own “good” is the party line.

Today Americans are being heard but they are not being listened to. As the older generations pass on, armed with a freedom loving spirit, the newer generations are going with the flow without a fighting bone in their body, unless of course a business proprietor made some money, is white or goes to a Christian church then it’s fair game to bash him or her down. The middle class, the business owner, the church goer, the laborer… these people built this wonderful country under a patriarchal system of united families from every street block. They see what is going on but no one with current power listens because those with real power don’t want thinking, God fearing, property owning, patriarchal families to have a say. That would be detrimental to the communist plan – to make people exist for the benefit of the state.

Ever miss a tax payment? Ever get a letter from the IRS stating you owe them money? Did you have any recourse? See?! The same can be asked concerning traffic tickets, medical insurance claims, auto insurance claims, property inspectors, health inspectors, zoning staff or any other government/corporate agency. You exist for the benefit of their purse. They don’t exist for the benefit of your way of life and purse. Today the state has gotten so big that it is they that need the resources as they come up with more excuses to siphon away your resources. You exist as a confrontational outsider to their bureaucratic environment as opposed to being a collaborative part of the process. Independent man, bad. Dependent man using government sanctioned programs, good.

If the mentality of man being here for the exclusive use by government is legit then what does the future hold? We already have porn piped into our televisions and computers. We have legal marijuana to get baked off of. We have easy divorce options. We got abortion clinics for days. We got Satan worshiping music. We got homosexual television shows. So what’s next? What will be pushed onto the majority from the elite-minority ruling class? How about sex with animals? Won’t that be a right? How about creating designer babies? Babies genetically enhanced to be docile and passive who never speak up, but they’ll be real good looking! How about having the World Court hammer American sovereignty? How about erasing all borders, cultures, customs and traditional families so that they become a relic of the past and only featured in historical documentaries? How about a world of single people who do what they want as long as it’s sanctioned by the global government? You like that? That’s where it’s all headed if you don’t pull your ass away from that computer.

So, do you exist for the benefit of the state or are you a freedom loving, hot-blooded patriot who thinks we should bring the mom and pop store back, stop the madness of globalization and rebuild our nation?

You decide. Time is short though.

Before I sign off allow me to leave you with this – The Naked Truth. It was first published in the late 50′s and is the communist plan for manipulating America from within. It really is eye opening. It includes the 45 Goals of Communism in America. List to follow.

45 Goals of Communism in America

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Image from Breitbart.